Politicians rarely make the news for doing things the right
way. This sparked the demented side of my brain (I am not sure whether that is
the right side or the left side) to wonder what addict makes the best governing
official. The answer is it depends on the area being governed.
In an area where the best action is no action the alcoholic
politician should be in office. In the history of hangovers, no hangover has
every produced a positive result excepting taking quality naps. A drunk will
also help the liquor industry and provide cheaper booze to the public. Also,
the hammered official will drain lobby organizations of money by going to
expensive dinners, drink too much on their dime, and promise to give lobbyist
things they will never remember.
In an area where the men and women are not pretty, send the
sex addict. Nothing positive might get done, but the people will feel better
that there is someone in this world willing to share a bed with them. I would
love to see the campaign that promises a bed to every constituent.
In an area where a lot of work needs to be done, send the
cocaine addict. That addict can’t sleep so you might as well put them to work.
In an area where there are a lot of underprivileged, send
the kleptomaniac. He can’t still from them, but he can go to areas nearby and
steal for them.
The one addiction that we should not allow in office is the gambling addict. If you are going to lose city hall, at least have the decency to sell it.
No comments:
Post a Comment